brother/sister? itchy/scratchy?
More seriously, why do we have to give them such generic names?
Aren't they individually and explicitly given a meaningful name already anyway?
E.g.
Channel work
Endpoint :work-remote:
...
Endpoint :work-local:
...
and that would naturally extend to sets of more than 2 "Endpoints".
Stefan
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
