It's not forgotten and a solution will be available with the timestamp and ocsp (unrelated but as I'm into signatures I may as well have a look).
Paulo > -----Original Message----- > From: mkl [mailto:m...@wir-sind-cool.org] > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:33 PM > To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Signature not found : Bug or feature ? > > > Hello, > > may I ask whether any investigation into this issue have been > made? Or if > any assistance with it would be welcome? > > Regards, Michael. > > > Paulo Soares wrote: > > > > This has all to be investigated and a solution will be > include in the > > release after the next. For the moment I don't have the > time to look at > > it. > > > > Paulo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Klink" <m...@wir-sind-cool.org> > > To: <itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 10:05 PM > > Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Signature not found : Bug or > feature ? > > > > > > Paulo, > > > > but to find those orphan signature fields I do have to loop > through all of > > them, don't I? And furthermore, why shouldn't there be > other kinds of > > fields > > without a visual representation? > > > > My main question, though, still is whether iText somehow > hickups when the > > AcroFields fields member is enhanced like this, especially > considering > > PdfStamper and PdfCopy* using AcroFields when generating new PDFs. > > > > Michael. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Paulo Soares [mailto:psoa...@glintt.com] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. November 2008 19:47 > > An: Post all your questions about iText here > > Betreff: Re: [iText-questions] Signature not found : Bug or > feature ? > > > > It may not be needed to loop through all the fields. This > situation can > > only > > occur if the sigflags are set and there's an orphan > signature field with a > > rectangle [0 0 0 0]. > > > > Paulo > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Michael Klink [...@wir-sind-cool.org] > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:08 PM > > To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Signature not found : Bug or > feature ? > > > > Hello, > > > > I happened to come across signatures just like the one Andreas Kühne > > posted > > in September. As I need to be able to handle these > signatures fairly soon > > (at least it looks like a greater hassle to persuade my > users not to use > > the > > secunet application that creates these signatures), I > created a small > > helper > > method that adds these signature fields not referenced in > the annotation > > arrays of the document pages; this helper has to be applied to an > > AcroFields > > instance right after getting it from the PdfReader. Essentially it > > replaces > > the data collected by AcroFields.fill() with an extended > set of fields in > > a > > way inspired by the that very method. > > > > It seems to work alright in my first tests, even though > there might be > > some > > object releasing still to do; and obviously the duplicate > code inside that > > method is not artful coding. > > > > Primarily I do wonder, though, whether iText might have any > trouble when > > later confronted with these additional entries among its fields, > > especially > > considering the PdfStamper and PdfCopy* classes when > writing derived PDF > > documents. > > > > Regards, Michael. > > > > > > Paulo Soares <psoares <at> glintt.com> writes: > > > >> I'm not sure if this is a bug from iText but this things > appear now and > >> then and, > >> like it or not, if it works in Acrobat it must be right. > I'll "fix" it. > >> > >> Paulo > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: itext-questions-bounces <at> lists.sourceforge.net > >> > [mailto:itext-questions-bounces <at> lists.sourceforge.net] On > >> > Behalf Of Andreas Kuehne > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:08 PM > >> > To: Post all your questions about iText here > >> > Subject: [iText-questions] Signature not found : Bug or feature ? > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I'm not sure whether I'm going to submit a bug or request a > >> > new feature : > >> > > >> > The AcroFields class has method returning all signatures ( > >> > getSignatureNames() ). > >> > > >> > Now I came across a pdf with a signature that doesn't get > >> > returned by getSignatureNames(). On the other hand the > >> > Acrobat Reader shows the signature without any problems. > >> > > >> > Analyzing the code shows that AcroFields are expected to be > >> > related to a page. But the signature doesn't ! > >> > So my question is : > >> > > >> > Is it a bug to expect every signature to be assigned to a > >> > page ( what isn't neccessarily so ) ? > >> > Or do AcroFields are expected to be page-related 'by nature', > >> > so my signature is just no AcroField and I must look for > >> > another way to retrieve the signature ? > >> > > >> > The problematic signed PDF is attached. > >> > > >> > Opinions welcome > >> > > >> > Andreas > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Signature-not-found-%3A-Bug-or-fea > ture---tp20382425p23485698.html > Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY > circumstances! Your > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - > but thanks to > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With > the NEW KODAK i700 > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > _______________________________________________ > iText-questions mailing list > iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions > > Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php > Check the site with examples before you ask questions: > http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ > You can also search the keywords list: > http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/ Aviso Legal: Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente ao destinatário. Pode conter informação confidencial ou legalmente protegida. A incorrecta transmissão desta mensagem não significa a perca de confidencialidade. Se esta mensagem for recebida por engano, por favor envie-a de volta para o remetente e apague-a do seu sistema de imediato. É proibido a qualquer pessoa que não o destinatário de usar, revelar ou distribuir qualquer parte desta mensagem. Disclaimer: This message is destined exclusively to the intended receiver. It may contain confidential or legally protected information. The incorrect transmission of this message does not mean the loss of its confidentiality. If this message is received by mistake, please send it back to the sender and delete it from your system immediately. It is forbidden to any person who is not the intended receiver to use, distribute or copy any part of this message. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
