D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: >| From: Rudy Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >| Mr. Myth wrote: >| >| > D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > >| > I have no advice. However, I too am seeing this problem as well on the >| > 2.6.17-1.2139+FC4 kernel and ivtv-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2139_FC4-0.7-115.rhfc4.at. >| > >| > I just reverted to the last 2.6.16 kernel for the time being. >| > >| > Michael >| > >| Which version of ivtv are you using? 0.7 is intended for the 2.7.17 kernel. > >Huh? I don't think that there is a 2.7 kernel series yet. Perhaps there >should be, but the development model changed and there is no unstable >series any more. Or is that "the unstable series took over the stable >series' number"? > > > Typo: 2.6.17 :-[
>If you (Rudy) meant 2.6.17, then you will see that Mr. Myth is using >one of them (and so am I). His was for FC4 and mine was for FC5. >Those are what the ATRPMS packages were built for, as I understand it. > >But it looks like something is wrong. Both Mr. Myth and I have >problems. > >Someone on IRC (freenode #ivtv-dev) suggested: ><fuzzie> well, the last calls there are to the video device > registration stuff, on top of v4l stuff being tainted perhaps your v4l > is wonky. but i don't really have a clue for what's really up, have > you tried just compiling ivtv against FC5+updates kernel source? > >I have not done that but perhaps I should. I was getting a hint that >IVTV doesn't build well on FC5 -- the normal kernel headers are not >sufficient. So it seemed like another level of adventure. I'm hoping >that an adventure is not required. > > I am running 0.7 against vanilla 2.6.17.4 kernel from kernel.org, and sofar no problems. Slackware-current installation. I've been using slackware since 1996 or so, and still very satisfied with that distro. Sometimes i will use Debian, but any RedHat trial has ended in frustration on my side. Cheers, Rudy _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
