On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:18:33PM +0200, Duncan Webb wrote: > A second solution is that some udev rules could be written to link the > devices to some other name. (but I'm rather found of /dev/videoX as the > device name as it represents what it is.) > > I'm just wondering if anyone has a better solution for this problem and > what it is?
The current controlling philosophy (that I personally disagree with) is that these names should be random. How about ivtv-video-*? I've never been able to remember what the different minor numbers are for with /dev/video* -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
