> 
> On Friday 19 August 2005 05:43 am, Pete Davis wrote:
> > > Try setting the ivtv option ivtv_dynbuf=0? Maybe it's the buffer
> > > allocation that is sometimes stalling?
> >
> > This caused all sorts of buffer allocation failures in ivtv and made the
> > linux box pretty much unusable. It killed my vnc session, wouldn't let
> me
> > telnet in, couldn't bring the monitor out of sleep mode on the box
> itself,
> > and ended up having to do a cold reboot.
> >
> > Pete
> 
> How about after the cold boot?  How did it behave?  If memory is an issue,
> then I can sort of see why all that weird behavior happened.  But after a
> fresh cold boot, by using ivtv_dynbuf=0 it'll "reserve" its memory right
> at
> boot when the module is loaded, so there'll definitely be free memory
> available.
> 
> ~Lou

Lou, didn't try that. I'll give that a shot. After I rebooted, I changed it
back :-( I figured the lockup indicated it was unhappy but it was probably
just from the mix of changes I had done. The machine is busy transcoding
some stuff now (and will be well into the night), but I'll give that a shot
in the morning and see if that fixes it.

Really, the delay isn't such a big deal since it's pretty easy to work
around. The CPU hogging issue is what's really bugging me and I can't get
around that. When it happens, my captures are basically crap because there
are so many dropped frames and I have to redo them.

Pete





-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to