On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 16:58 -0800, Henry Leinhos wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 11:51 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >>> Tony writes: 
> >>> 
> >>> > Since I've never had to do this before, how would one go about 
> >>> applying
> >>> > this on an FC6 x86-64 system? I've never applied a patch before, first
> >>> > time so I want to make sure I do this right. This was under the > 
> >>> /ivtv-0.10.0/misc directory. 
> >>> 
> >>> Extract the mplayer source.  Change to the top of mplayer's source 
> >>> directory, and type: 
> >>> 
> >>> patch -p1 </path/to/ivtv-0.10/misc/MPlayer-1.0pre7try2-ivtvosd.diff 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> 
> I actually tried this against MPlayer-1.0rc1 (the latest from the mplayer 
> site) and got the following failures: 
> 
> $tar xvjf MPlayer-1.0rc1.tar.bz2
> ...
> $ cd MPlayer-1.0rc1 
> 
> patch -p1 < ../MPlayer-1.0pre7try2-ivtvosd.diff
> patching file libvo/ivtv.h
> patching file libvo/Makefile
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 3.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file libvo/Makefile.rej
> patching file libvo/video_out.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 91 (offset 5 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 140 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 244 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
> The next patch would create the file libvo/vo_ivtv.c,
> which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] n
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file libvo/vo_ivtv.c.rej
> patching file libvo/vo_ivtvosd.c
> patching file mplayer.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 4300 (offset 1857 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 4332.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mplayer.c.rej 
> 
> How different is pre7try2 from rc1? 
> 
> unpatched, I get errors when trying to compile the ivtv stuff against the 
> 0.10.0 ivtv driver headers. 
> 
> Henry 
> 
> 
Henry, would it be taboo to approach the mplayer group with this?
Tony


_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to