On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 22:38 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > Some other (mplayer, faac, etc.) packages are conflicted, being > > offered both by Fedora and ATRPMS and that can be a problem. > > That's also not quite true - there is no mplayer package at Fedora for > political reasons (some may say legal even)
Ahh, sorry. I remember having at times problems where one package would replace another which would want to replace the first and such and thought it had to do with mplayer most recently. I'm having something like that now with MythTV wanting to install all when updating just myth-frontend. Additionally libmyth from 0.20.1-158 to 0.20.1-160/161 the package name changed and seems to be split into pieces. I know this is IVTV not Myth ;) but it's another example of the circular dependency, or mismatched dependency anyway. And another example of how Smart helped me resolve the issue while the packages get sorted out. _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
