> Then as a second step, if you can normally reliably reproduce the tinny
> audio, look to reduce the delays in this part of the patch:
>
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bugfix/rev/7753cdcebd28#l2.11
>
> I would appreciate it. I was thinking 10 msec for the first msleep()
> and 140 to 100 msec for the second msleep.

no, that's not enough. 
We need altogether 300ms  (see my test results from 3rd January: 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/14332)

Greets,

Martin


_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to