On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 18:53 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 00:05 +0100, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > > > Then as a second step, if you can normally reliably reproduce the tinny > > > audio, look to reduce the delays in this part of the patch: > > > > > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bugfix/rev/7753cdcebd28#l2.11 > > > > > > I would appreciate it. I was thinking 10 msec for the first msleep() > > > and 140 to 100 msec for the second msleep. > > > > no, that's not enough. > > We need altogether 300ms (see my test results from 3rd January: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/14332) > > Ah excellent work! Thank you! > > I didn't get it in my Inbox apparently, otherwise, I would have already > fixed it and asked for it to be pulled. (Not that Mauro has pulled > anything for the past 3 weeks or so until a few days ago). > > According to your table the 50 ms/250 ms case works. Is that one OK for > you?
Oh, nevermind, I see you're OK with the 150/150 case. I'll do that. Regards, Andy > Regards, > Andy > > > Greets, > > > > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users > _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
