On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 00:05 +0100, Martin Dauskardt wrote:
> > Then as a second step, if you can normally reliably reproduce the tinny
> > audio, look to reduce the delays in this part of the patch:
> >
> > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bugfix/rev/7753cdcebd28#l2.11
> >
> > I would appreciate it. I was thinking 10 msec for the first msleep()
> > and 140 to 100 msec for the second msleep.
> 
> no, that's not enough. 
> We need altogether 300ms  (see my test results from 3rd January: 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/14332)

Ah excellent work!  Thank you!

I didn't get it in my Inbox apparently, otherwise, I would have already
fixed it and asked for it to be pulled. (Not that Mauro has pulled
anything for the past 3 weeks or so until a few days ago).

According to your table the 50 ms/250 ms case works.  Is that one OK for
you?

Regards,
Andy

> Greets,
> 
> Martin



_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to