Hola de nuevo,
Casualmente ayer me imprimí el boletin de P. Suber del mes de octubre
2010 y lo leí por la noche. En la primera parte habla de su "aventura
en el intento de autoarchivar" (interpretación propia), y entre muchas
de las cosas que menciona, hay un párrafo que viene al hilo de esta
discusión:
/"There are great advantages in having authors deposit in their own
institutional repository. It helps institutions *share, analyze, and
evaluate their own research output*. It adds local incentives to funder
mandates to prod and reward author participation. It *adds robustness
to preservation*, *on the LOCKSS principle*, by distributing the
literature around a large network. It ensures that the *system will
scale with the growth of published research*, simply* from the fact that
distributed networks are more capacious than any individual node*.
Above all, *it nurtures local cultures of self-archiving at every
university*, which will benefit non-funded research and research funded
by non-mandating funders"..../.
(http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/10-02-10.htm)
Un saludo
Reme
http://www.accesoabierto.net
----------------------------------------------------
Normas para el correcto uso del correo electrónico:
http://www.rediris.es/mail/estilo.html
----------------------------------------------------
