El pasado 30 de septiembre, durante el acto de investidura como Doctor Honoris Causa en nuestra Universidad, el maestro Tom Wilson captó la atención de todos los presentes (y de los medios de comunicación especialmente) cuando hizo este comentario un poco antes de terminar su discurso de investidura. Os lo extracto y si alguien desea el discurso completo se lo puedo hacer llegar por mail.

saludos

Francisco Javier Martínez Méndez
Universidad de Murcia

============================================

Increasingly, however, communities and societies are demanding that secrecy be limited to what is genuinely related to national security, rather than what is related to, for example, the relationships between business and government, between governments and dictators, and within and between corporations seeking to hide, for example, the conditions under which their products are made.

In recent months, the Website Wikileaks has been much in the news because of its release of 75,000 files relating to the war in Afghanistan. The founder of the site, Julian Assange, has been damned by the neo-conservatives in the USA as having 'blood on his hands', while others praise him for revealing to the public what the public ought to know about what is being done in its name.

The very existence of Wikileaks and its success in uncovering information, while protecting its sources, demonstrates the plausibility of the slogan, /Information wants to be free/, which is attributed to the hacker Stephen Brand. The state's desire to keep information secret might be described as Orwellian and it is ironic that Brand used the phrase at a conference in /1984. / But we can also see that there are those who do not want information to be free, in this sense; witness the sexual harassment slur on the founder of Wikileaks which happened just last month.

Limits to the free communication of ideas also result from the tendency towards monopoly structures in the communication media. One only has to think of Berlusconi's control of a significant proportion of the media in Italy, or the not so obvious connection in France between Sarkozy and those friends of his who control the media. In the UK, the dominance of Rupert Murdoch's Sky TV, as well as his ownership of newspapers, threatens the free flow of opposing ideas.

If the only information the citizen has is that provided either by the political class or by business interests, _/*how is democracy possible?*/_




----------------------------------------------------
Normas para el correcto uso del correo electrónico:
                http://www.rediris.es/mail/estilo.html
----------------------------------------------------

Responder a