I thought Java 8. You should be able to tell from the Ant build file. AFK.

Gary

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 23:14 Joseph Kessselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I've started pulling the pieces together so I can test and tweak.
>
> Sanity check: Which version of Java are we officially (a) compiling under
> and (b) compiling for? I currently have OpenJDK 11 and 19 installed. As
> checked out, the head branch's build says it's expecting folks to use Java
> 1.3; the earliest version 11 can be told to compile for is 1.6.
>
> Which branch/fork is the current release candidate?
>
>
> On 2/22/2023 3:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Sounds good.
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 13:07 Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the poke. I'll try to look at that this week.
>>
>> --
>>    /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
>> -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
>>    /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/
>>
>> () Plaintext Ribbon Campaign
>> /\ Stamp out HTML mail!
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2023 12:09:28 PM
>> *To:* Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* xalan-j-us...@xml.apache.org <xalan-j-us...@xml.apache.org>;
>> Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu>
>> *Subject:* Re: Tentative Release dates - New version
>>
>> Hi Gary,
>>    I've had a private conversation with Joseph Kessselman (I'm copying
>> this mail to him as well) few days ago, where he kindly wrote to me
>> that, he'd like to fix the XalanJ implementation and tests build for
>> Linux for the XalanJ 2.7.3 release.
>>
>> I believe that, we should wait for his work on that, for using that
>> within XalanJ 2.7.3 release.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:04 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > We are working on a new release without a set deadline. It has gone in
>> fits and spurts as different issues have popped up. I hope the new release
>> will make it out within a month or so, but we are all volunteers, finding
>> time as best as possible, so there is no guarantee of even that.
>> >
>> > Gary
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mukul Gandhi
>>
>

Reply via email to