Dnia 2012-10-15, pon o godzinie 12:15 +0200, Alexandre Jousset pisze: > > But I still don't see a rationale, why local components are better > than > > remote ones? > > > > Why does local component should be preferred just because the > connection > > happened to come from local c2s? > > Going to a remote component involves going through local > router, then through remote router, then remote component. It adds a > hop + a (physical) network access.
That's a technical detail that should not affect the load balancing algorithm. If I set two components one with weight 1 and one with weight 2, the second one should get two times more requests than first one, regardless where is it connected and where the requests are coming from.
