Dnia 2012-10-15, pon o godzinie 02:22 +0200, Alexandre Jousset pisze: > We talked earlier about weighted randomization instead of > priorities. With weighted randomization it is impossible to be sure > that a local component will be preferred, this is why I made an > implicit priority for local components, still using weighted random > between local components, or between remote components when needed.
Right. But I still don't see a rationale, why local components are better than remote ones? Why does local component should be preferred just because the connection happened to come from local c2s? > To do otherwise, we should use weighted random + priorities, > this would add more complexity and misunderstanding in the > configuration process. I was thinking more of a binary switch "prefer local components", than reintroducing priorities.
