2009/6/19 Dominik Waßenhoven <domw...@users.sourceforge.net>: > Morten Omholt Alver schrieb: > > >> I think it's time to release 2.5 soon. There hasn't been much feedback >> from the beta versions, and I think perhaps the effect of these betas >> is fairly small as long as we don't have designated beta testers. > > I always use the beta versions for my work, and I never experienced any > severe problems, so I reported none. On the one hand, one could conclude > that beta versions are not necessary. On the other hand, I would rather > use stable versions if I were in a critical phase of work (finishing a > paper, for instance). Thus, I would plead for keeping at least one beta > version per final version.
I agree that we need some sort of testing period in any case, Perhaps next time we should try a more organized beta test? We could try to recruit some people who agree to test the beta for a set period, and report any bugs plus give a short summary at the end. -- Morten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Jabref-devel mailing list Jabref-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-devel