2009/6/19 Dominik Waßenhoven <domw...@users.sourceforge.net>:
> Morten Omholt Alver schrieb:
>
>
>> I think it's time to release 2.5 soon. There hasn't been much feedback
>> from the beta versions, and I think perhaps the effect of these betas
>> is fairly small as long as we don't have designated beta testers.
>
> I always use the beta versions for my work, and I never experienced any
> severe problems, so I reported none. On the one hand, one could conclude
> that beta versions are not necessary. On the other hand, I would rather
> use stable versions if I were in a critical phase of work (finishing a
> paper, for instance).  Thus, I would plead for keeping at least one beta
> version per final version.

I agree that we need some sort of testing period in any case, Perhaps
next time we should try a more organized beta test? We could try to
recruit some people who agree to test the beta for a set period, and
report any bugs plus give a short summary at the end.


-- 
Morten

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Jabref-devel mailing list
Jabref-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-devel

Reply via email to