Hi Morten, On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Morten Omholt Alver<mortenal...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/6/19 Dominik Waßenhoven <domw...@users.sourceforge.net>: >> Morten Omholt Alver schrieb: > I agree that we need some sort of testing period in any case, Perhaps > next time we should try a more organized beta test? We could try to > recruit some people who agree to test the beta for a set period, and > report any bugs plus give a short summary at the end.
My 'testing' of JabRef goes up and down with when I use JabRef, which is when I write papers, and in particular papers with new references... I have to say that, increasingly, I use online cites like CiteULike to copy/paste BibTex entries directly into the file, instead of via JabRef, and keep JabRef for when reorganizing things, or some mild clean up... Now, moreover, I typically only use a subset of the functionality, but seen the number of downloads of the 2.5b2 (1700+ !), I'd say you would have received some bug reports if there were serious issues... I am now downloading the beta, and will run some tests based on my use... And, thanx for keeping this project going! Egon -- Post-doc @ Uppsala University http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Jabref-devel mailing list Jabref-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-devel
