Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown:
> I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
> keywords.
>
> I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can
> recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still
> running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a
> major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the
> groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from
> an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name.
>
> Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism
> been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to
> recover groupstree data from the .bib databases?
>
> I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the
> information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will
> again destroy that information.
>
> Haines Brown
I know that there were changes in the group function. But I do not know
whether your problem is related. My groups at least were maintained when
I updated jabref to 3.4.
Regards
Bernhard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________ Jabref-users mailing list Jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
