On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 04:31:54PM +0200, tobiasd...@gmx.de wrote:
> Dear Haines,
> 
> I'm sorry for the problems you have with the way Jabref handles groups
> in the new version. Let me explain what happened: Previously, the
> group membership was stored at the end of the file in one of these
> Jabref comments. This behaviour had some disadvantages, so we changed
> it. Now Jabref rembers the group information in the bibtex entry
> itself (BibEntry). So your entries now have a groups field (have a
> look at the bibtex source), where the names of the static groups are
> saved.
>
> Because only the names of the groups are stored in this new field,
> JabRef can no longer differentiate between groups with the same
> name. This might be a bit inconvienent, but you can fix it easily by
> giving the groups different names and then manually correcting the
> assignments.
>
> I hope this helps for now. If you still experience problems, please
> post them on github. https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues Best,
> Tobias

Thanks, Tobias, that was a big help. The only problem I have is that
when I change the name of a group and associate an entry to it, the
other groups with same name are highlighted. When I try to remove these
others from being associated with the entry, the original association is
also lost. I'll bring this up in github.  

Haines Brown

> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Gesendet: Sunday, 12 June 2016 um 15:45:13 Uhr
> Von: jabref-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
> An: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Jabref-users Digest, Vol 115, Issue 2
> Send Jabref-users mailing list submissions to
>       jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       jabref-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       jabref-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Jabref-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Groups using not possible (Bernhard Kleine)
>    2. Re: Groups using not possible (Bernhard Kleine)
>    3. Re: Groups using not possible (Haines Brown)
>    4. Re: Groups using not possible (Bernhard Kleine)
>    5. Re: Groups using not possible (Haines Brown)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:44:07 +0200
> From: Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.kle...@gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
> To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <4c362304-557a-68b1-6327-8978b19ee...@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> Am 10.06.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
> 
> > I started using groups with the previous jabref version. I have some
> > 1300 bibentries and groups are as large as 140 or as small as 3 entries.
> >
> > When I want to display groups, however, I tried en vain to see the
> > selected entries, mostly jabref adds the entry selected to a groups when
> > clicking on a group. This is not the behaviour I am used to. How to
> > display a group and not add or delete entries from group without the
> > risk to do the wrong? It is not obvious.
> >
> > Bernhard
> I looked in detail: I had selected a group of 13 entries. I added the
> pdf location of one of this papers to jabref in the "allgemein
> (General?)" dialogue of the edit article form. When I finished adding
> the pdf location, the selection of the 13 papers in the group got lost.
> Clicking on the group in the Group form did not bring up the selection
> again, but deleted the selected entry from the group. Re-clicking added
> it again, but still the selection was gone. I do not find a simple way
> to select a group when a paper is selected in that group.
> 
> Bernhard
> > spitzhalde9
> > 79853 lenzkirch
> > bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
> > www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
> > -
> > thunderbird mit enigmail
> > GPG schl?ssel: D5257409
> > fingerprint:
> > 08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:05:03 +0200
> From: Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.kle...@gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
> To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <ccd4cd13-f50c-5723-7031-603199be5...@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> Am 12.06.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
> > Am 10.06.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
> >
> >> I started using groups with the previous jabref version. I have some
> >> 1300 bibentries and groups are as large as 140 or as small as 3 entries.
> >>
> >> When I want to display groups, however, I tried en vain to see the
> >> selected entries, mostly jabref adds the entry selected to a groups when
> >> clicking on a group. This is not the behaviour I am used to. How to
> >> display a group and not add or delete entries from group without the
> >> risk to do the wrong? It is not obvious.
> >>
> >> Bernhard
> > I looked in detail: I had selected a group of 13 entries. I added the
> > pdf location of one of this papers to jabref in the "allgemein
> > (General?)" dialogue of the edit article form. When I finished adding
> > the pdf location, the selection of the 13 papers in the group got lost.
> > Clicking on the group in the Group form did not bring up the selection
> > again, but deleted the selected entry from the group. Re-clicking added
> > it again, but still the selection was gone. I do not find a simple way
> > to select a group when a paper is selected in that group.
> >
> > Bernhard
> Unselecting "gruppenzugeh?rigkeit bearbeiten (manage entries in a
> group?)" did allow me again to select groups. It is not mentioned in the
> German Manual.
> Bernhard
> 
> -- 
> --
> spitzhalde9
> 79853 lenzkirch
> bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
> www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
> -
> thunderbird mit enigmail
> GPG schl?ssel: D5257409
> fingerprint:
> 08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 08:18:30 -0400
> From: Haines Brown <hai...@histomat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
> To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <20160612121830.ga4...@engels.historicalmaterialism.info>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
> keywords.
> 
> I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can
> recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still
> running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a
> major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the
> groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from
> an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name.
> 
> Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism
> been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to
> recover groupstree data from the .bib databases?
> 
> I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the
> information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will
> again destroy that information.
> 
> Haines Brown
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:22:30 +0200
> From: Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.kle...@gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
> To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <589b858d-eb06-122d-e698-72fb9a025...@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown:
> > I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> > that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> > of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
> > keywords.
> >
> > I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can
> > recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still
> > running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a
> > major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the
> > groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from
> > an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name.
> >
> > Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism
> > been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to
> > recover groupstree data from the .bib databases?
> >
> > I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the
> > information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will
> > again destroy that information.
> >
> > Haines Brown
> I know that there were changes in the group function. But I do not know
> whether your problem is related. My groups at least were maintained when
> I updated jabref to 3.4.
> Regards
> Bernhard
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:45:02 -0400
> From: Haines Brown <hai...@histomat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Jabref-users] Groups using not possible
> To: jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <20160612134502.gb4...@engels.historicalmaterialism.info>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 02:22:30PM +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> > Am 12.06.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Haines Brown:
> > > I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
> > > that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
> > > of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
> > > keywords.
> > >
> > > I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can
> > > recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still
> > > running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a
> > > major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the
> > > groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from
> > > an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name.
> > >
> > > Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism
> > > been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to
> > > recover groupstree data from the .bib databases?
> > >
> > > I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the
> > > information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will
> > > again destroy that information.
> > >
> > > Haines Brown
> 
> > I know that there were changes in the group function. But I do not know
> > whether your problem is related. My groups at least were maintained when
> > I updated jabref to 3.4.
> > Regards
> > Bernhard
> 
> I really would like to know what this new groups mechanism is. CHANGELOG
> suggests that with JabRef 3.3 the data held in the jabref-meta:
> groupstree: sections of bibliographic databases was transferred to
> something called "BibEntry". I find it succeeded for some databases, but
> not all. 
> 
> I see that JabRef now generates a host of files under
> /usr/local/share/JabRef/jabref-master/... and apparently overwriting
> them are user's preferences in ~/Xjabref-master/.... Unfortunately I was
> unable to locate a BibEntry there. There are MSBibEntry.java files, but
> these hold no specific group information.
> 
> So my questions are:
> 
> a) What and where is this "BibEntry"? It apparently is not the name of a
> file.
> 
> b) Was it intended that this BibEntry preserve the original groups
> hierarchy? It does not seem to distinguish groups organized in
> hierarchic fashion. Even where I've restored the group tree
> functionality, groups with same name but situated in different places in
> the tree are not distinguished. Is BibEntry just a flat file database?
> 
> c) How could all group data be lost when I moved up from JabRef 9.10 to
> JabRef 3.4? Is there something I should have done to prevent it? While I
> can recover old group hierarchies data, I don't want to loose recent
> additions again.
> 
> Haines Brown
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jabref-users mailing list
> Jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
> 
> 
> End of Jabref-users Digest, Vol 115, Issue 2
> ********************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Jabref-users mailing list
Jabref-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users

Reply via email to