on 3/27/01 8:29 AM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #3. I'm worried about the name. Given that Sun owns the trademark for "J2EE" > and seem to take it pretty seriously, they *might* have a problem with us > having a product with that in the name...regardless of whether not not it is > legal. Note, I understand he didn't have a problem with it under SF, but the > reality of the matter is that we are in more public view than a SF project > is. Therefore, it matters more. Shoot, I just remembered... Another example of why I bring this up is the JBoss Project...which was originally called "EJBoss". Sun made them change the name. So, I'm -1 on accepting the project under the name J2EEUnit. -jon
- cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/j2eeunit/web/sampl... vmassol
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/j2eeunit/... Vincent Massol
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/j2eeu... Craig R. McClanahan
- J2EEUnit under the GPL? Peter Donald
- Re: J2EEUnit under the GPL? Vincent Massol
- Re: J2EEUnit under the GPL? Vincent Massol
- [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to A... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation... Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit dona... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit ... Ted Husted
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit ... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit dona... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to A... Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation... Ted Husted
- cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/j2eeunit/web/... vmassol
