on 3/27/01 8:50 AM, "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about this mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just did a reply to
> a mail that was sent to me mentionning that I had to change the J2EEUnit
> license and pmc was in copy. As I am new here I didn't know sending to pmc
> was not relevant. I'm the only one to blame. This is the last mail you'll
> receive from me ... :)
I seriously doubt that. :-)
> The J2EEUnit project was started on november 2000 and has been well
> received. There have been more than 12,000 downloads and around 800 pages
> viewed per day. It started as a one guy project (me) but there are now a few
> users (I'd say around 3-4) also sending changes. Others (in the range of 20)
> are sugessting changes but not doing the modifications themselves. The
> majority are just end users.
Number of users != Community
> Again, I'm not too familiar with the different options. From the previous
> discussions I have had and followed, it seems that Jakarta-Commons would the
> right place. This is where I have uploaded it.
It is already uploaded there? Then what the heck is this proposal about?
> It's a pity if I have to change the name ... I would of course very much
> prefer to keep it. But I can see your point. Let's wait for others to
> comment on that.
You *have* to change the name. I'm strongly -1 on it for the reasons that I
specified in my follow up email.
EJBoss -> JBoss
J2EEUnit -> JTwoEEUnit
:-)
-jon
