On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> Alex Fern�ndez wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Rodney!
> > 
> > Well, I have a singular opinion. If the package is to contain utilities,
> > everything would end up in org.apache.commons.util.
> > 
> > So, org.apache.commons.collections is probably a better choice.
> >
> 
> How about o.a.commons.util.collections.*
> 

I personally like org.apache.commons.collections instead.  Pretty much
everything we envision for Commons would qualify for o.a.c.util.foo type
names, so the "util" part doesn't really buy us much.

> geir
> 

Craig

Reply via email to