On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Alex Fern�ndez wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rodney!
> >
> > Well, I have a singular opinion. If the package is to contain utilities,
> > everything would end up in org.apache.commons.util.
> >
> > So, org.apache.commons.collections is probably a better choice.
> >
>
> How about o.a.commons.util.collections.*
>
I personally like org.apache.commons.collections instead. Pretty much
everything we envision for Commons would qualify for o.a.c.util.foo type
names, so the "util" part doesn't really buy us much.
> geir
>
Craig