"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> > Alex Fernández wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rodney!
> > >
> > > Well, I have a singular opinion. If the package is to contain utilities,
> > > everything would end up in org.apache.commons.util.
> > >
> > > So, org.apache.commons.collections is probably a better choice.
> > >
> >
> > How about o.a.commons.util.collections.*
> >
>
> I personally like org.apache.commons.collections instead. Pretty much
> everything we envision for Commons would qualify for o.a.c.util.foo type
> names, so the "util" part doesn't really buy us much.
>
Ok. :) Fine by me. Count me in for o.a.c.collections.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
