"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
>
> This is a cool utility class, and a good thing, so I'm all for it.
>
> How about checking into the sandbox, we can work on basic docs and
> packaging, and then bring it to a full vote when it's organized a bit
> for people to see?
Sure, sounds good. I'm making my sandbox now!
>
> geir
>
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a Configuration class that is the amalgamation of some
> > classes that were originally present in JServ. After a bit of
> > work this class is now used in Velocity and Turbine, and I believe
> > a variant is still being used in Cocoon though I'm not sure.
> >
> > I think this class might be a nice properties type configuration
> > counterpart to the XML type configuration tools that are either
> > already in the commons are heading there. The XML digester code
> > from Catalina? Not totally sure on that one.
> >
> > At any rate I would like to see if it would be possible to move
> > the Configuration class that is currently in Velocity to the
> > commons. Rigth now there is an ugly import in a lot of the Turbine
> > code and using Turbine _requires_ the velocity jar because I
> > didn't want to copy the class over into the Turbine tree.
> >
> > I have to admit that I haven't stayed on top of the commons
> > lineage so I'm not really sure how I go about proposing the
> > movement of the Configuration class to the commons other
> > then asking here.
> >
> > Could someone point me in the right direction?
> >
> > --
> > jvz.
> >
> > Jason van Zyl
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> > http://tambora.zenplex.org
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://tambora.zenplex.org
