Remy,
My intention is not to force myself to the project without asking
permission, which is why I asked ... :-)
I have been ranting a bit because I'd like to help now and wish to
understand what is the release plan :
* has 1.0 been released yet (the one the Slide relies on) ?
* if no, when is the date ?
* if I am admitted as committer, can I commit on the main branch now ?
I just want to be in sycn with you guys ! And get the job done ! :-)
However, Rodney has already done extensive work. I have also worked this
week end to discover (after) that there was a rlwrefactoring branch. So now
I have modifications that conflict with Rodney's changes. I guess I'll need
to update with the rlwrefactoring branch and work from there. Should I
submit patches to the rlwrefactoring branch then ?
If so, I would like to know when the rlwrefactoring branch will be merged in
the main trunk ? This is simply because I need the
several-header-with-same-name patch in httpclient before I can release
Cactus 1.2. However this patch modifies the external API as users who call
HttpMethod.getHeaders() will no longer receive a hashtable of Header objects
but rather a Headers object which has methods like "Header getHeader(String
name)", "Header[] getHeaders(String name)", .... (this is my patch) or each
entry in the hashtable will actually be a Vector of Header (which I like
less than the new Headers class).
Could you explain the plans the httpclient releases ?
Thanks Remy,
-Vincent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [httpclient] new committer
> > You don't need to ask for permission to be a committer.
> > Because you are already a member of the Commons subproject,
> > you simply need to add your name to the STATUS.html file when
> > you are ready to perform a commit.
>
> I don't agree. If Dirk needs to submit patches + a vote, then Vincent
should
> need to do at least the same.
>
> Remy
>
>
