Remy Maucherat wrote on 8/28/01 10:43 am: >> > Step 2 : Create a 1.x >branch so that bug >corrections (but no new >features) >> > can continue to be made >for 1.x versions. >> >> +1. > >I made a mistake when >casting my vote there, if the >"no new features" is >interpreted strictly, in which >case I would vote -1. > >Remy I don't think this was meant to be interpreted literally. Of course, the maintainers of the 1.x branch can add features if they like. - Morgan _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- RE: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Sanders
- RE: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Sanders
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forwa... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forwa... Charles Burdick
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Morgan Delagrange
- RE: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Sale, Doug
- RE: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Sale, Doug
