Re: Util dependency on Collections?

[Jim Cheesman]

At 10:16 AM 30/08/01, you wrote:
>James Strachan wrote:
> >
> > Though how about making it a SequencedHashMap rather than a
> > SequencedHashtable? Hashtable is so 1999 :-)
> >
> >
>
>I still don't like the name. SequencedHashMap , whatever, says to me
>"What sequence?". Someone in another post said about a "ListMap"
>implementation. Isn't that exactly the same idea as this one, just with
>a better name?


I implemented one of these a while back, and called it OrderedHashMap. Now 
I think about it, it seems to imply some kind of sort has taken place - 
though that could just be from Spanish leaking into my English ;)


SequencedHashMap doesn't do much for me either, though I can't think of a 
better one for now, at least not without ending up with some horrendously 
long name such as (InputTimeOrderedHashMap - yuk! ;)



Jim





--

                           *   Jim Cheesman   *
             Trabajo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (34)(91) 724 9200 x 2360
              Exaggeration is not 
all it's cracked up to be.