Sebastien Lelong wrote:
>> About: "the Jallib Team":
>> You see this kind of term used everywhere. It sounds good, but I hate it
>> when I cannot find who are behind that name (and I suspect that
>> frequently it is only one person)! So I suggest to keep the term Jallib
>> Team, but add an URL to it which opens a list of participants for those
>> who insist to know ;-)
>
> OK, I see what you mean. But which page to point to ? I think it
> doesn't exist. Can I ask you to create it ?
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib/web/JallibTeam.html
http://www.robh.nl/jal/jallibTeam.html
Not all Jallib members are listed. I consider only contributors and
other most active member as 'the' Jallib Team. Is this OK with everyone?
The file should be freely accessable, also non Jallib members. I don't
know if that is the case with files of the Jallib group. I've put also a
copy on my own site, which I know is open.
I could also uploaded this file in the JalList group, but a reference is
'difficult'.
>> { not mention of the <register>_<bitfield> naming convention?? }
>
> but this one, I cannot understand. Do we need to inform people of this
> naming convention, in this mail ?
On second thought, better don't: too technical.
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
