> > > After reading and re-reading the arguments I came to the conclusion that > would prefer BSD but can live with ZLIB despite this drawback.
I'm not sure I'm happy to read this :) About the license: * we need to ask permission to libs' author to re-license their lib (I think mainly Stef, Wouter will sure be ok) * googlecode does not have "zlib" as an available license * can we think about having 2 license: - zlib for jal lib (and sample ?) - BSD for the rest Why 2 licenses ? I don't feel quite alright about licensing every tools & scripts other than jal code. Please note this is *not* related to programmed chips, so it shouldn't be a problem. This isn't a good reason, but having BSD licensed stuff is also a way to stay on googlecode. Do you agree ? Would you still be happy ? Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
