Hi William,
> Sites like Sourcesafe and Googlecode list a bunch of licenses at > first, and then add more as requested. Unfortunately, I think googlecode doesn't add licenses as requested. Their opinion on this is there are many, too many existing OS licenses out there (which is true), so they want to reduce and homogenize them, by providing only the most representative ones (I disagree). Also note if there are 2 licenses, it's not to have one free, and another not free, it's mostly for a matter of distributing binaries: jal libs are zlib licensed, the rest is BSD licensed, so programmed chips/hex files can be distribute without attribution (no copyright notice), and the rest must reproduce the license. So, if one day, have a jalide (jal IDE) or anything else which can be distribute as binaries, it won't fall under zlib. BTW, anyone who wants to deal with the licenses into the repos ? (or is it my burden :)) Cheers, Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
