I was about (and commit it) just including the compiler in our jallib
packages, as a default. That is, not providing more packages.

Do you want more packages  (with and without compiler) ?

OK about including the compiler version in the package filename.


> I don't like that the directory structure of the current download
> packages have a fixed base directory (\jallib-0.1beta). I prefer much
> more the Firefox way, namely a release independent name, in our case
> \Jallib, or even better no base directory at all and only a 'relative'
> subdirectory structure.  Advantage is much easier migration: rename the
> old jallib and create a new Jallib.  No makefiles, batchfiles or other
> scripts to change with each new version.

If I understand correctly, you don't want to have the version in the
directory's name which include "lib", "sample", etc... ?
I strongly disagree with that :). Because when you download several
versions, you don't know which one you have ! To do what you say, I use
symlinks: "jallib" pointing to the one I want. If you also want to get rid
of the version, you can simply rename it, can't you ? No base directory
is... well... this is how zip are usually made, and I really, really don't
like that, because when you unzip, it can polute all your current directory.


Seb


2008/12/23 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>

>
> 2008/12/23, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>:
> >
> >
> >
> > Jallib-pack seems OK to me. I would add an indication about the jallib
> > version and the compiler version in the name of the package file, for
> > example: Jallib-pack-24i-0.1
> Okay with me
>
> > I don't like that the directory structure of the current download
> > packages have a fixed base directory (\jallib-0.1beta). I prefer much
> > more the Firefox way, namely a release independent name, in our case
> > \Jallib, or even better no base directory at all and only a 'relative'
> > subdirectory structure.  Advantage is much easier migration: rename the
> > old jallib and create a new Jallib.  No makefiles, batchfiles or other
> > scripts to change with each new version.
> >
> I strongly agree on this!
>
> Joep
>
> >
>


-- 
Sébastien Lelong
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to