> > > exclude when sample are generated automatically (ie. with -a option) ? > Yes, exclude from -a, that's what I mean.
OK, I'll add this feature. When a test file has a "@jallib skip-auto" tag, then the script will skip automatic generation sample from it. > We can't know how users will use jallib. Providing a i2c level 0 samples add > value, and also show users how to deal with i2c com. at low level (kind of > howto/tutorial) > That's 1% of the users. 99% will search for an example to get i2c > running. And I don't want to put those on the level0 track. > That's a whole discussion again... What about this 1% ? Should we forget them ? Let's have 100%, with documented samples (level1 is easier than level0). The more I think about this, the more I think that, *for now*, Bert's starterpacks are for newbies, and jallib for users who want to get a step further into jalv2, microcontrollers, and actually want to understand more details. Just a thought... Oh, just another one thought: remember the "ez" libs ? Maybe we could work on this and provide an "ez" way to use jallib, less flexible, but easier (and maybe funnier). Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
