I too felt that Bert is against an initiative like jallib, which I had discussed before. Having a full pack with jallib, jaledit and PIC shell with an installable setup program for win32 will definitely make Bert Pack useless.
Sunish On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected] > wrote: > But it does have things we don't have yet: >> - random routine >> - more delays > > > I agree to add them :) BTW, careful with Bert's libs: there are explicitely > not compatible with commercial purpose (or books). This means they can't be > added to jallib with a ZLIB license. > > There's also pic_program_eeprom.jal. I can remember discussion between Rob > and Eur, about merging this into pic_data_eeprom (or the like). I don't know > where it is now. Maybe we could re-open the discussion). > > About random.jal. dice() procedure seems to be bugged: it returns a randum > number between 1 and 6, but "explore" other number (see while loop... end > loop). Not all numbers between 1 and 6 has the probability to be chosen. > > > Seb > -- > Sébastien Lelong > http://www.sirloon.net > http://sirbot.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
