Taking BSD style jal files and modifying and repacking as bertpack is against the spirit of the jal community.Ofcourse his books and site was key to promoting jal.
Sunish On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Sunish Issac <[email protected]> wrote: > I too felt that Bert is against an initiative like jallib, which I had > discussed before. Having a full pack with jallib, jaledit and PIC shell with > an installable setup program for win32 will definitely make Bert Pack > useless. > > Sunish > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Sebastien Lelong < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> But it does have things we don't have yet: >>> - random routine >>> - more delays >> >> >> I agree to add them :) BTW, careful with Bert's libs: there are >> explicitely not compatible with commercial purpose (or books). This means >> they can't be added to jallib with a ZLIB license. >> >> There's also pic_program_eeprom.jal. I can remember discussion between Rob >> and Eur, about merging this into pic_data_eeprom (or the like). I don't know >> where it is now. Maybe we could re-open the discussion). >> >> About random.jal. dice() procedure seems to be bugged: it returns a randum >> number between 1 and 6, but "explore" other number (see while loop... end >> loop). Not all numbers between 1 and 6 has the probability to be chosen. >> >> >> Seb >> -- >> Sébastien Lelong >> http://www.sirloon.net >> http://sirbot.org >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
