Agreed. 695 is the last jalv2 manual fixes, 696 was a typo in the batch file.
2009/1/2, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > I plan to exclude everything from revision 697 (ie. 698, 699, 700, ...), 697 > being included. See last changes for a better understanding: > > r700 > - moved baudrate from test to board file - board file of Seb is now > preferred (better since it shows use of internal osc) - regenerated samples > Today (60 minutes ago) > jsuijs > > r699 > fix: only generate samples for one board, if requested... > Today (3 hours ago) > sebastien.lelong > > r698 > first draft for "my" 16f88 board > Today (3 hours ago) > sebastien.lelong > > r697 > add make_sample.sh + move description about make_* in another section since > not in the compiler distrib, as previously said > Today (4 hours ago) > sebastien.lelong > > r696 > [No log message] > Today (14 hours ago) > jsuijs > > r695 > [No log message] > Today (14 hours ago) > jsuijs > > r694 > fixed to make links work with firefox too. > Yesterday (17 hours ago) > jsuijs > > r693 > Updated batch files for new blink sample naming Added batch files list of > files in README > Yesterday (19 hours ago) > robhamerling > > r692 > Fixed links in JalV2-manual.html > Yesterday (20 hours ago) > jsuijs > > r691 > Update for new naming of blink-an-LED samples > Yesterday (22 hours ago) > robhamerling > > r690 > Remove duplicate (with lowercase filename) > Yesterday (22 hours ago) > robhamerling > > 2009/1/2 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > > OK. We don't need to rollback: since I have to create a new branch for the > 0.1 release, I'll do this giving a revision before the ones including the > very new stuff. Joep, do you agree ? > > > > > > Seb > > > > > > 2009/1/2 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastien Lelong wrote: > > > > > > > I've seen some commits about i2c, and now about test using "my 16f88 > board". > > > > If we decide to release, I'd say we need to stop changing the SVN tree > when > > > > it's involved in the release (that is, changed files are in > TORELEASE). > > > > > > Yes, we should release now and exclude the very new stuff. There is > > > enough news compared to 0.1beta. > > > > > > Regards, Rob. > > > > > > -- > > > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sébastien Lelong > > http://www.sirloon.net > > http://sirbot.org > > > > > > -- > Sébastien Lelong > http://www.sirloon.net > http://sirbot.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
