Hi Albert,
[email protected] wrote: > Sorry for the late reaction, did perform some test, and it works OK. > The only thing was that the PortX'Get functions should have a "end > function" in stead of a "end procedure" statement. After these > modifications it works as expected. After I sent you the modified device file for the 18f4550 I sent you an additional message in which I said I wanted to remove the PORTx'get() functions for the 18F. I added these without proper thinking (copy of the shadowing functions of the baseline and midrange. But for the 18Fs the 'get for a whole port is redundant. A function PORTA'get which returns the contents of PORTA is only a more complicated form of reading PORTA directly. Would you be so kind to repeat your test(s) after removing the portx'get() functions in the 18F4550 device file? Regards, Rob -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
