Hi Rob, Sorry I've missed your 2nd e-mail about the PortX get proposal, just did a quick test and it works fine without the PortX'get functions Albert
On Mar 16, 8:57 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Albert, > > [email protected] wrote: > > Sorry for the late reaction, did perform some test, and it works OK. > > The only thing was that the PortX'Get functions should have a "end > > function" in stead of a "end procedure" statement. After these > > modifications it works as expected. > > After I sent you the modified device file for the 18f4550 I sent you an > additional message in which I said I wanted to remove the PORTx'get() > functions for the 18F. I added these without proper thinking (copy of > the shadowing functions of the baseline and midrange. But for the 18Fs > the 'get for a whole port is redundant. A function PORTA'get which > returns the contents of PORTA is only a more complicated form of reading > PORTA directly. > Would you be so kind to repeat your test(s) after removing the > portx'get() functions in the 18F4550 device file? > > Regards, Rob > > -- > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
