On 23 mrt, 16:27, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I can't say if this should be done or not (Joep/Rob will ?), but merging
> these 2 libraries into a single one have huge impacts on existing code base.
> If we decide to go this way, this must be done so users are informed one of
> this library (say format.jal) is deprecated. We'll need a :
>
> _warn "format.jal is now deprecated, please use print.jal instead"
>
> at the beginning of format.jal. This library will then stay for one release
> or two, so users have time to migrate their.
>
> That said, we now need to wait and figure out if these libs should be merged
> or not. (actually, I must confess I've always wondered which to choose.
> Since print.jal seems mostly used in samples, I did it that way, and
> ignoring format.jal...)
I know it's a bit off work but if we combine all good things from both
libs in to one
we have a nice powerful lib which i think will be used and appreciated
by many people.
Greetz
Richard
>
> Cheers,
> Seb
>
> 2009/3/23 Richard <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I am working on issue 27 and 63 and found out that print.jal and
> > format.jal have almost
> > the same functions, therefore I want to combine them to 1 library
> > called print.jal.
>
> > You all agree ?
>
> > Greetz
>
> > Richard
>
> --
> Sébastien Lelonghttp://www.sirloon.nethttp://sirbot.org- Tekst uit
> oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
