On 23 mrt, 20:33, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Richard wrote:
> > I am working on issue 27 and 63 and found out that print.jal and
> > format.jal have almost
> > the same functions, therefore I want to combine them to 1 library
> > called print.jal.
>
> If procedures/functions are redundant then I'm in favour of combining
> these libs.
> Advantage of a combined lib is that there will be no dilemma later in
> which lib to put new or improved formatting procedures!
> I would keep the name 'format.jal' for the combined lib.
I know format.jal is used more often but IMHO print is a more logic
name for this lib.
Print value in decimal to lcd => “print_byte_dec(lcd, 250)”
Compare to:
Format value in decimal to lcd => format_byte_dec(lcd, 250)”
And what about the nice procedure “print_string(lcd,string)” this
should than be named format_string(lcd,string).
Off course its just an feeling, but what ever you all decide is ok
with me
Greetz
Richard
>
> Regards, Rob.
>
> --
> Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
