OK. (BTW, I'll be off next week, and back beginning of week of April 6). If we have another compiler version soon, I'll be able to finish my GP2D02 library too. We'll see then if we can put lcd_hardware in the release or not (Richard, are schematic/PCB ready ? I remember having read something about a resistor tied to MCLR being low, what did you guys decide about this ? Is there any other "blocking/waiting-for-feeback" points ?). We'll also have to build and test the board. I'll build this controller anyway, so I can do this and properly add documentation on blog. But this will take me a lot of (but necessary) time.
Cheers, Seb > As for the lcd libs: they are okay now in the way that they provide > more functionality for the same interfaces. > I'd like to add backlight control (both digital and variable) and, > when this is done, also add this to the lcd_app and library. But > assuming I don't have more time, it will take me another week or two > (without the documentation...). The reason I tell you this, is that I > am a bit reluctant to release the lcd_app (+ lib + schematics) without > the backlight control, since this would force users to update their > controller later on. And they might omit the backlight hardware since > the support is missing. > > So i'd suggest we releae without the lcd_hardware or wait until the > week of april 6. > > Joep > > > > 2009/3/23 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > > Hi guys, > > > > Just a usual question :) What do you want to put in next release ? So far > > I've seen things about: > > > > - USB libs > > - LCD controller libs > > - LCD schematic/diagram > > - GP2D02 lib > > - recently, print/format refactoring > > - (and device files, of course) > > > > I'd say it's quite a good time to release, but maybe not all of these > > points. For instance, GP2D02 IR ranger lib waits for jalv2 fix about > passing > > pins as parameters. Maybe we could wait for next compiler release since > > it'll come soon. > > > > What about other points ? (personally, I'd love to release LCD controller > > libs + schematic/diagram, because it would add another/new "dimension" to > > jallib: hardware. But don't get me wrong: USB would also be great, etc... > :) > > > > What's your point on this ? > > > > Cheers, > > Seb > > -- > > Sébastien Lelong > > http://www.sirloon.net > > http://sirbot.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
