Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > Before I forget, pwm_ccp[x].jal must not be edited manually, there are > generated, as most of the code is very similar between those libs. Too late! Well, no problem: I'm experimenting with pwm_ccp1. When I'm satified with the result we'll see how to proceed. > As for the issues, I'd need more time to remember what PWM is about and > provide an answer :) OK. > Does it bother you doing this ? From what I understand, these are about > optimizations and, maybe, fixing inconsistencies. So, no hurry... No it doesn't bother me at all! Optimisation is not always low priority, e.g. when memory utilisation is a showstopper. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
