Comment #7 on issue 94 by robhamerling: Legacy aliasing enhanced modules in device files http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=94
Just a check: Should the subfields of ECCPxCON register be aliased too? It may not be needed when the library uses a shadow register, like the PWM libraries. But I assume 'yes' and then I also assume the 'E' prefix of these subfields should be removed for the alias name. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
