Hi Sunish Issac wrote: > With the release of so many samples, looks like its time to split the > samples folder. Spliting by sample type would be more sensible than by > PIC name. IIRC there was discussion about this before.
Yes, the collection has happily grown, and finding the right sample maybe some work. But is that so bad? It's nothing compared to the effort to build and provide this collection, and for free. You must not look a gift horse in the mouth! Specify your criterium for splitting of the sample directory. Number of files, other? It may already help to split off the blink samples, these use no libraries at all. Splitting by type (I suppose you mean used library) is not so straight forward since many samples use more than one library. So be more specific with your suggestion. About splitting the include library: Device files might be put in a separate directory, which would require one extra directory in the include pathspec. But in my view there is even less reason to split, because users have hardly any reason to look in a library. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
