Sebastien Lelong wrote: > Hi guys, > > > 0.5 beta1 release packages are available on group file section: > > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib/files > > > Let me know if something's gone wrong. I've included tutorial PDF book in > jallib-pack packages only. > Is there still a problem adding the 'm' version of the compiler to the latest release?
Wayne > Cheers, > Seb > > 2009/12/6 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > >> Hi guys, >> >> >> Once upon a time samples were split by device. I was quite happy with this >> structure, because I could access all samples available for a given target. >> Then samples were all put into a single directory. And even if there were a >> lot of files, this flat structure was something easy to use (search for a >> sample not available for your PIC, using a feature, just to get some example >> code, ...). I now like this structure. >> >> So, I agree with Rob, current structure does the trick, and splitting it >> isn't that easy. Since one sample can use multiple libraries, it can be that >> simply flat. Splitting by family is like splitting by device, you may get >> lots of file in PIC16, and not much in PIC10. >> >> Splitting samples should bring a functionality other than "there are less >> files into a single directory". Jallib API doc (jalapi), for each library, >> provides samples using it. This is an interesting entry point. Since going >> from samples to libraries isn't that flat, maybe we can go further and start >> to build a database, queried from our website ("I want some samples using >> SPI library, whatever the PIC, or using 16F886, or using a PIC in PIC16 >> family, or using a PIC closed to mine, that is in the same datasheet, or the >> same datasheet as PIC X, Y, Z, ......) >> >> >> Cheers, >> Seb >> >> >> >> 2009/12/6 Sunish Issac <[email protected]> >> >> Yes Rob. I was thinking of splitting the sample folder, not the lib/include >>> files. >>> I had not thought about sample files using multiple libraries. >>> >>> If no other split is possible, may be we can atleast split by PIC10,12,16 >>> and 18 families. >>> >>> Sunish >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Sunish Issac wrote: >>>>> With the release of so many samples, looks like its time to split the >>>>> samples folder. Spliting by sample type would be more sensible than by >>>>> PIC name. IIRC there was discussion about this before. >>>> Yes, the collection has happily grown, and finding the right sample >>>> maybe some work. But is that so bad? It's nothing compared to the effort >>>> to build and provide this collection, and for free. You must not look a >>>> gift horse in the mouth! >>>> >>>> Specify your criterium for splitting of the sample directory. Number of >>>> files, other? It may already help to split off the blink samples, these >>>> use no libraries at all. >>>> Splitting by type (I suppose you mean used library) is not so straight >>>> forward since many samples use more than one library. So be more >>>> specific with your suggestion. >>>> >>>> About splitting the include library: Device files might be put in a >>>> separate directory, which would require one extra directory in the >>>> include pathspec. But in my view there is even less reason to split, >>>> because users have hardly any reason to look in a library. >>>> >>>> Regards, Rob. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "jallib" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "jallib" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sébastien Lelong >> http://www.sirloon.net >> http://sirbot.org >> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
