m...@watty wrote:
My own extreme opinion is that if a small group of people want overly
strict cosmetic rules on Libraries, then those people should be
prepared to "edit" code to their standard.
But the preferable route would be good strict rules that are more
flexible.
Also the bigger issue is the overall structure and naming conventions.
How or who decides this?
Do we know how many people use the libraries?
Is there a mailing list (apart from this high noise level list) that
tells them of changes to a library that might break (or fix) their
code?
That would be nice.
Can the build bot simply email a link to a file instead of pages of
content emailed automatically?
If that was implemented it would save me a lot of my monthly download
allocation. As it is now I am close to running over my limit and will
have to either drop this list or pay a penalty for going over my limit.
Neither option pleases me.
Wayne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
