Hi Vasi et al 2010/4/15 funlw65 <[email protected]>: > Hi guys, > Forgive me for I jumped here. If data is used in pragma definitions, > then why is not considered as compiler keyword. There is not a list > with "forbiden" keywords? If something is used in pragma, then should > not be used in other places. This is not an antlr parser issue - more > like a jal problem.
I thought of that too. 'Data' is a keyword in the context of pragma only, just like many others are (like nop after 'asm'). I can't imagine that all possible keywords within a specific context are excluded for general use when you use antlr. Or to explain it in example: In the statement 'var byte data ', data is an IDENTIFIER token and this should be the case, even if there is a rule to process the statement 'pragma data' With my ignorance, I suspect this means 'data' is not a token on itself and wonder how to setup antlr grammar for this. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
