Hi Mike 2010/4/15 m...@watty <[email protected]>:
> We can't "come back to pragma later". It's very important. It depends largely on the context if this statement is true. If the goal is to convert jal code into c code for, let's say, the avr gcc compiler and design it in such a way variables and constants from the include files (.h) can be used, I don't see any use for pragma. And if 'come back to pragma later' means: parse it in a general way now and decide later if the grammar is enhanced or pragma's are processed by the backend, there is no problem now either. > yes asm is a separate syntax & grammar to JAL. Could be a true statement or an opinion, but how does it help in respect to the fact that jal source files contain asm statements (syntax, grammar), this is parsed by the compiler and should be included by the grammar in some way too? Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
