In my (bigger than others) ignorance, a token can have his own list of sub-tokens?
Vasi(funlw65) On Apr 15, 11:19 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vasi et al > > 2010/4/15 funlw65 <[email protected]>: > > > Hi guys, > > Forgive me for I jumped here. If data is used in pragma definitions, > > then why is not considered as compiler keyword. There is not a list > > with "forbiden" keywords? If something is used in pragma, then should > > not be used in other places. This is not an antlr parser issue - more > > like a jal problem. > > I thought of that too. 'Data' is a keyword in the context of pragma > only, just like many others are (like nop after 'asm'). I can't > imagine that all possible keywords within a specific context are > excluded for general use when you use antlr. > > Or to explain it in example: > In the statement 'var byte data ', data is an IDENTIFIER token and > this should be the case, even if there is a rule to process the > statement 'pragma data' > With my ignorance, I suspect this means 'data' is not a token on > itself and wonder how to setup antlr grammar for this. > > Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
