JalV2 is being developed on Jallist, should it have it's own group too? I don't think it really matters where we talk about it, this new software will support other devices and these devices will need libraries in Jallib. Are you saying these libraries should be put somewhere else? Will this be included in the jallib pack when completed? I think this is one of the difficulties that we may be faced with. There are many questions that have not been talked about.
Matt. On May 10, 1:52 am, "m...@watty" <[email protected]> wrote: > BSD is OK > > However I still think this project is nothing to do with Jallib, other > than some of same people involved. It should have a separate group and > organisation name. Putting it under Jallib detracts from the > Translation project and the Jal Libraries. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
