Off course, I invite also Massimo Brazzi to contribute to this... On Aug 1, 8:41 pm, funlw65 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 1, 8:22 pm, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We are also not > > sure if there will be more then one compiler (Joep's phraser). We > > might need folders by compiler before device type. > > > Matt. > > Well, here, for an efficient treatment of the problem it must exist a > Jallib equivalent on ARM, AVR (ATmega) and PIC32. It can be a > legitimate Jallib expansion and an insurance for the success. Look at > this as cross platform development (Sebastien, this is the usage I > suggest for your Arduino board - as for me, I have EvB4.3). > > But it is already off topic, sorry... > > P.S. This is another argument in favor of elm-chan.org FAT library - > the portability... AND, in general, another reason of adopting JAL and > Jallib on long term. It become more and more interesting...
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
